Kill It Dead

"At the death of our founder," says W. J. Grundy, thethan $1,500,000 would not pay a federal estate tax
former chairman of Jomac, Inc., a Pennsylvaniaand most likely would not have to file a federal estate
manufacturer of protective gloves, "we spent over $3tax return. The applicable exclusion amount increases
million to redeem stock so estate taxes could be paidto $2,000,000 for decedents dying in the years 2006,
and control of the company could be maintained. This2007 and 2008. The amount increases to $3,500,000
was $3 million not available for operations and thefor 2009. According to the Economic Growth and Tax
division in trouble was sold -- reducing our employmentRelief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the federal estate
by about 30 employees and our sales by about $5tax disappears for the year 2010, but the tax returns in
million."(Boston Globe, June 15, 2000) The Center for2011 at the 2001 level when the temporary repeal
the Study of Taxation found that three out of fourexpires. As an extra tax applied to income that has
families faced with liquidating all or part of theiralready been drained by decades of other taxes, it is
business to pay the estate tax would have to cut theirone of the most loathsome pieces of looting in the
payroll in the process. Studies by the Institute for Policyfederal tax code. Put simply, it is double taxation on a
Innovation (IPI) and Congress's own Joint Economicworking person's lifetime wages. The federal
Committee have found that the estate tax costsgovernment cashes in on a wealthy person's death by
communities more in lost jobs and lower economiclooting his or her assets with a tax on a whole lifetime
growth than it raises for the U.S. Treasury (William W,of work. Fortunately, opponents of the estate tax are
Beach, The Heritage Foundation). The very same thingstruggling to make repeal permanent, but face stiff
can happen right here in the Valley.The estate tax (oropposition from the usual suspects in the Senate. The
"death tax" as it has become known, though perhapsHouse has already voted to permanently repeal it. A
wrongly so) is a tax on inherited wealth and cansenate compromise could be a likely result, though an
amount to more than 50% of one's estate. For aunsatisfactory one. Our own U. S.
person dying during 2005, an estate with a value less