The $700 Billion Bailout Plan - A Good Idea?

<!-- @page { margin: 2cm } P { margin-bottom:(FHA) to refinance failing mortgages.
0.21cm } -->$4 billion is for local communities to help them buy and
We have all heard plenty of talk, both positive andrepair foreclosed homes.
negative, about the $700 billion bailout plan, and there$87 billion will go to JPMorgan Chase & Co to help
are now rumors of similar plans in the works. Thethem bailing out Lehman Brothers.
discussion dominated the recent election, and it$29 billion will go to JPMorgan Chase's for the buyout
continues to be a primary concern both on "Wallof Bear Stearns & Co in March.
Street" and "Main Street." Many people who have$200 billion will be loaned to various banks issued
never concerned themselves with high level economicthrough the Fed's Term Auction Facility.
issues are finding themselves writing, or being solicited 
to write, letters to their congressmen and women inWhen we look at the details of where the money is
support of or opposition to the plan.going, it is harder to be for or against the plan as a
 whole. Many people find certain terms reasonable and
But with this high level financial decision and high levelothers unfair. But looking at an itemized summary of
of potential effect on individual taxes, it is important forwhere the money goes can help us be more sober
those of us who do not spend our days reading aboutwhen we think about whether or not the plan, or plans,
the Secretary of the Treasury to know what isare a good idea. $700 in one chunk may initially invite
involved with this plan. Many people continue tofear and skepticism, but, when we see the details, it
wonder if investing $700 billion to rescue the U.S.makes more sense.
financial system, and as a result the U.S. economy, is 
really a good idea.Personally, I would like to see a list like this created that
 consolidates all of the bailout plans, from the past,
A little perspective helps us see what is really involvedpresent, and future, into one solid plan. This will make it
with this plan. $700 billion is of course a huge amounteasier to manage the huge amount of money that
of money. But in 2008 alone, the U.S. Treasuryneeds to be committed. And let's face it: These
Department and the Federal Reserve alreadybailouts will happen anyway, whether the Senate and
committed more than $900 billion dollar to bailouts.the House of Representatives approve the bill or not.
Since they did not all happen at the same time, youThe only difference is that they will happen behind the
were unlikely to have heard about them, nor to havescenes and in smaller portions, and we might not even
realized the magnitude. There are reports that overnotice it.
the past three years, bailouts already on the books 
have exceeded a total of $4 trillion. But most of theI for one would like to have more transparency, and a
deals either went unreported in the mainstream mediaconsolidated plan is one way to achieve it.However,
or you might have forgotten about them already. Withbefore committing any money, certain key people
all of this in mind, $700 billion, while still huge, is not soneed to be held accountable for their actions. Saying
unusual as it might otherwise seem.that the money will not be used for "Golden
 Parachutes", though necessary, is insufficient. Those
But even if it is the timing, rather than the amount, thatwho put our economy in the position of needing to be
makes this bailout plan unique, where does all thisthrown a costly lifesaver by the American taxpayers
money go? The new $700 billion in particular isneed to be fired at the least and probably put in jail.
supposed to be doled out in the following amounts:The worst possible outcome is that this bailout money
 could go to the same people who created this mess.
The Federal Reserve will loan $85 billion to Insurer AIG.Having a more transparent account of where the
$200 billion will go to Fannie Mae and Freddie Max atmoney goes will help us all be sure that this does not
$100 billion each.occur.
$300 billion is for the Federal Housing Administration