The Democrats' Tower of Babel

Each of the two ratified versions of the health care billdoes the House.
currently waiting in Congress was barely passed, byThe House bill covers 5 million more people than the
virtually the slimmest margin possible, in a hecticSenate bill by expanding Medicaid to those earning up
last-minute stampede. Dozens of harsh compromisesto about $2,000 more than in the Senate bill.
had to be hammered out to cobble together the fragileThe Senate version gives $100 million to Nebraska for
framework now standing in each chamber.indefinite coverage of all new Medicaid enrollees in the
The two bills are like delicate Jenga towers, swayingstate (to buy Ben Nelson's vote). The Senate bill gives
nerve-wrackingly in the breeze, that must now be$300 million to Louisiana for Medicare increases (for
reassembled by a team of 535 clumsyMary Landrieu's vote); $10 billion to Vermont for new
attention-seekers into a tower twice as tall. Butpublic health centers (for Bernie Sanders' vote); billions
legislators across the two chambers-and even withinto Nebraska and Michigan to waive nonprofit insurers'
them-are not even speaking the same language.excise taxes (for Ben Nelson and Carl Levin's votes);
Here are a few of the myriad discrepancies legislatorsmillions to Massachusetts and Vermont for Medicaid;
must reconcile to ensure that their monument toand millions to Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania for
Obama's greatness doesn't fall:Medicare Advantage. None of these provisions is in
In the House version of the bill, a government-runthe House bill.
insurance exchange is created on a national level andThe Senate version includes, per the insistence of
includes a public option. In the Senate version,construction unions, an important exception to the
exchanges are created on the state level and do notemployer mandate. As an article in the New York
include a public option. Virtually identical!Times titled "In Health Bill for Everyone, Provisions for a
The House completely bans the practice 0f chargingFew" reports, "Under the Senate bill, businesses with
those with preexisting conditions higher premiums. Thefewer than 50 employees would be exempt from the
Senate allows insurers to offer unlimited discounts forpenalties in every industry but construction." In the
customers who engage in subjectively definedconstruction industry, the mandate holds for employers
wellness activities: say, exercising, eating healthy, "notwith as few as 5 employees. The House includes no
having contracted lung cancer"...such provision.
Insurance exchanges are implemented in 2013 in theRestrictions on abortion funding are tight in the House,
House bill and 2014 in the Senate bill.with no federal funding allowed; and loose in the
In the House version, employers are forced to provideSenate, with mere separation of federal and private
insurance for their employees and pay a fine if they domoney, and states allowed to make up whatever rules
not. In the Senate version, employers are not requiredthey want regarding abortion funding.
to provide insurance, but pay a fine for employeesCoverage for illegal immigrants is not disallowed in the
who opt for government-run insurance and receiveHouse; it is explicitly banned in the Senate.
federal subsidies. The House has higher penalties thanIt should be sobering for Democrats to realize that if
the Senate.just one Senator or two Representatives decide they
The House version funds the bill by imposing a surtaxcan't tolerate the alternative version of even one of
on families making over $1 million a year. The Senatethese provisions, that will be enough to topple the
version establishes a tax on those with "Cadillac" plans,whole health care reform edifice.
which includes not only many union members, butIt's no wonder, then, that Congressional Democrats
millions of families who will unexpectedly findnow plan to merge the bills behind closed doors,
themselves unlucky Cadillac owners over the next 10shutting out all Republicans from discussion of the
years due to the non-inflation-adjusted nature of thereconciliation process and preventing them from using
provision.parliamentary procedures to slow consideration of the
The House version does not tax insurance offered bybill and allow the public to digest the proposed changes.
employers; the Senate version taxes employerTalking Points Memo cites one Democratic House aide
insurance above a threshold.who proudly admits, "This process cuts out the
The House version charges older people a maximumRepublicans." The House will simply take the Senate's
of twice the premiums as younger people; the Senatebill, amend it, vote on it, and send it to the Senate; who
version sets a maximum ratio of three-to-one. Thewill then amend the bill, vote on it, and send it to the
House offers fewer insurance subsidies for the middleHouse; and back and forth until some hideous, lopsided,
class than does the Senate. The Senate offersstructurally unsound blueprint garners enough votes in
weaker measures to limit out-of-pocket costs thanboth chambers.