Learn everything about the taxes you pay


sandiegoapa.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

progressive taxes PA Local Taxes
PA local taxes fica tax rates 2007
nj futa rate fica 2007
fica rates pa local taxes
inherited money 2007 FICA
How to calculate federal and state tax illinois current mileage rate
california mileage rate Calculating FICA Taxes

To Tax or Not to Tax - This is the Question

To tax or not to tax - this question couldincome and economic activity;Forced every
have never been asked twenty yearsmember of society to - directly or indirectly
ago.Historically, income tax is a novel- pay for professional services related to
invention. Still, it became so widespread andhis tax obligations, or, at least to consume
so socially accepted that no one daredhis own resources (time, money and energy) in
challenge it seriously. In the lunaticcommunicating with authorities dealing with
fringes there were those who refused to paytax collection.Thousands of laws, tax
taxes and served prison sentences as aloopholes, breaks and incentives and
result. Some of them tried to translate theirseemingly arbitrary decision making, not open
platforms into political power andto judicial scrutiny eroded the trust that a
established parties, which failed dismally inmember of the community should have in its
the polls. But some of what they said madeinstitutions. This lack of transparency and
sense.Originally, taxes were levied to payeven-handedness led to the frequent eruption
for government expenses. But they underwent aof scandals which unseated governments more
malignant transformation. They began to beoften than not.All these very dear prices
used to express social preferences. Taxmight have been acceptable if taxes were to
revenues were diverted to pay for urbanachieve their primary stated goals. That they
renewal, to encourage foreign investmentsfailed to do so is what sparked the latest
through tax breaks and tax incentives, torebellious thinking.At first, the governments
enhance social equality by evenlyof the world tried a few simple recipes:They
redistributing income and so on. As Bigtried to widen the tax base by better
Government became more derided - so werecollection, processing, amalgamation and
taxes perceived to be its instrument and thecrossing of information. This way, more tax
tide turned. Suddenly, the fashion was topayers were supposed to be caught in "the
downsize government, minimize its disruptivenet". This failed dismally. People found ways
involvement in the marketplace and reduce thearound this relatively unsophisticated
total tax burden as part of the GNP.Taxes areapproach and frequent and successive tax
inherently unjust. They are enforced, usingcampaigns were to no avail.So, governments
state coercion. They are an infringement oftried the next trick in their bag: they
the human age old right to property. Money isshifted from progressive taxes to regressive
transferred from one group of citizens (lawones. This was really a shift from taxes on
abiding taxpayers) - to other groups. Theincome to taxes on consumption. This proved
recipients are less savoury: they either doto be a much more efficient measure - albeit
not pay taxes legally (low incomewith grave social consequences. The same
populations, children, the elderly) - orpattern was repeated: the powerful few were
avoid paying taxes illegally. But there is noprovided with legal loopholes. VAT rules
way of preventing a tax evader from enjoyingaround the world allow businesses to offset
tax money paid by others.ResearchVAT that they paid from VAT that they were
demonstrated that most tax money benefitedsupposed to pay to the authorities. Many of
the middle classes and the rich, in short:them ended up receiving VAT funds paid the
those who need it least. Moreover, thesepoorer population, to which these tax breaks
strata of society were most likely to use taxwere, obviously, not available.Moreover, VAT
planning to minimize their tax payments. Theyand other direct taxes on consumption were
could afford to pay professionals to helpalmost immediately reflected in higher
them to pay less taxes because their incomeinflation figures. As economic theory goes,
was augmented by transfers of tax money paidinflation is a tax. It indirectly affects the
by the less affluent and by the lesspurchasing power of those not knowledgeable
fortunate. The poor subsidized the taxenough, devoid of political clout, or not
planning of the rich, so that they could payrich enough to protect themselves. The
less taxes. No wonder that tax planning issalaries of the lower strata of society are
regarded as the rich man's shot at taxeroded by inflation and this has the exact
evasion. The irony is that taxes weresame effect as a tax would. This is why
intended to lessen social polarity andinflation is called the poor man's tax.When
friction - but they achieved exactly thethe social consequences of levying regressive
opposite.In economies where taxes gobble uptaxes became fully evident, governments went
to 60% of the GDP (France, Germany, to name aback to the drawing board. Regressive taxes
few) - taxes became THE major economicwere politically and socially costly.
disincentive. Why work for the taxman? WhyProgressive taxes resembled Swiss cheese: too
finance the lavish lifestyle of numerousmany loopholes, not enough substances. The
politicians and bloated bureaucracies throughnatural inclination was to try and plug the
tax money? Why be a sucker when the rich andholes: disallow allowances, break tax breaks,
mighty play it safe?The results were sociallyabolish special preferences, eliminate
and morally devastating: an avalanche ofloopholes, write-offs, reliefs and a host of
illegal activities, all intended to avoidother, special deductions. This entailed
paying taxes. Monstrous black economies wereconflicts with special interest groups whose
formed by entrepreneuring souls. Theseinterests were duly reflected in the tax
economic activities went unreported andloopholes.Governments, being political
totally deformed the processes ofcreatures, did a half hearted job. They
macroeconomic decision making, supposedlyabolished on the one hand - and gave with the
based on complete economic data. Thisother. They wriggled their way around
apparent lack of macroeconomic controlcontroversial subjects and the result was
creates a second layer of mistrust betweenthat every loophole cutting measure brought
the citizen and his government (on top of thein its wake a growing host of others. The
one related to the collection ofsituation looked hopeless.Thus, governments
taxes).Recent studies clearly indicate that awere reduced to using the final,
reverse relationship exists between thenuclear-like, weapon in their arsenal: the
growth of the economy and the extent ofsimplification of the tax system.The idea is
public spending. Moreover, decades ofaesthetically appealing: all tax concessions
progressive taxation did not reverse theand loopholes will be eliminated, on the one
trend of a growing gap between the rich andhand. On the other, the number of tax rates
the poor. Income distribution has remainedand the magnitude of each rate will be pared
inequitable (ever more so all the time) -down. Marginal tax rates will go down
despite gigantic unilateral transfers ofconsiderably and so will the number of tax
money from the state to the poorer socio -rates. So, people will feel less like
economic strata of society.Taxes are largelycheating and they will spend less resources
considered to be responsible for theon the preparation of their tax returns. The
following:They distorted businessgovernment, on its part, will no longer use
thinking;Encouraged the misallocation ofthe tax system to express its (political)
economic resources;Diverted money to strangepreferences. It will propagate a simple,
tax motivated investments;Absorbedtransparent, equitable, fair and non
unacceptably large chunks of the GDP;Deterredarbitrary system which will generate more
foreign investment;Morally corrupted theincome by virtue of these traits.Governments
population, encouraging it to engage infrom Germany to the USA are working along the
massive illegal activities;Adverselysame lines. They are trying to stem what is
influenced macroeconomic parameters such asin effect a tax rebellion, a major case of
unemployment, the money supply and interestcivil disobedience. If they fail, the very
rates;Deprived the business sector of capitalfabric of societies will be affected. If they
needed for its development by spending it onsucceed, we may all inherit a better world.
non productive political ends;Caused theKnowing the propensities of human beings, the
smuggling of capital outside the country;Thesafe bet is that people will still hate to
formation of strong parallel, black economiessee their money wasted in unaccounted for
and the falsification of economic recordsways on bizarre, pork barrel, projects. As
thus affecting the proper decision makinglong as this is the case, the eternal chase
processes;Facilitated the establishment ofof the citizen by his government will
big, inefficient bureaucracies for thecontinue.
collection of taxes and data related to



1 A B C D E 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127