To Tax or Not to Tax - This is the Question

To tax or not to tax - this question could have neverevery member of society to - directly or indirectly -
been asked twenty years ago.Historically, income taxpay for professional services related to his tax
is a novel invention. Still, it became so widespread andobligations, or, at least to consume his own resources
so socially accepted that no one dared challenge it(time, money and energy) in communicating with
seriously. In the lunatic fringes there were those whoauthorities dealing with tax collection.Thousands of
refused to pay taxes and served prison sentences aslaws, tax loopholes, breaks and incentives and
a result. Some of them tried to translate their platformsseemingly arbitrary decision making, not open to judicial
into political power and established parties, which failedscrutiny eroded the trust that a member of the
dismally in the polls. But some of what they said madecommunity should have in its institutions. This lack of
sense.Originally, taxes were levied to pay fortransparency and even-handedness led to the
government expenses. But they underwent afrequent eruption of scandals which unseated
malignant transformation. They began to be used togovernments more often than not.All these very dear
express social preferences. Tax revenues wereprices might have been acceptable if taxes were to
diverted to pay for urban renewal, to encourageachieve their primary stated goals. That they failed to
foreign investments through tax breaks and taxdo so is what sparked the latest rebellious thinking.At
incentives, to enhance social equality by evenlyfirst, the governments of the world tried a few simple
redistributing income and so on. As Big Governmentrecipes:They tried to widen the tax base by better
became more derided - so were taxes perceived tocollection, processing, amalgamation and crossing of
be its instrument and the tide turned. Suddenly, theinformation. This way, more tax payers were
fashion was to downsize government, minimize itssupposed to be caught in "the net". This failed dismally.
disruptive involvement in the marketplace and reducePeople found ways around this relatively
the total tax burden as part of the GNP.Taxes areunsophisticated approach and frequent and
inherently unjust. They are enforced, using statesuccessive tax campaigns were to no avail.So,
coercion. They are an infringement of the human agegovernments tried the next trick in their bag: they
old right to property. Money is transferred from oneshifted from progressive taxes to regressive ones.
group of citizens (law abiding taxpayers) - to otherThis was really a shift from taxes on income to taxes
groups. The recipients are less savoury: they either doon consumption. This proved to be a much more
not pay taxes legally (low income populations, children,efficient measure - albeit with grave social
the elderly) - or avoid paying taxes illegally. But there isconsequences. The same pattern was repeated: the
no way of preventing a tax evader from enjoying taxpowerful few were provided with legal loopholes. VAT
money paid by others.Research demonstrated thatrules around the world allow businesses to offset
most tax money benefited the middle classes and theVAT that they paid from VAT that they were
rich, in short: those who need it least. Moreover, thesesupposed to pay to the authorities. Many of them
strata of society were most likely to use tax planningended up receiving VAT funds paid the poorer
to minimize their tax payments. They could afford topopulation, to which these tax breaks were, obviously,
pay professionals to help them to pay less taxesnot available.Moreover, VAT and other direct taxes on
because their income was augmented by transfers ofconsumption were almost immediately reflected in
tax money paid by the less affluent and by the lesshigher inflation figures. As economic theory goes,
fortunate. The poor subsidized the tax planning of theinflation is a tax. It indirectly affects the purchasing
rich, so that they could pay less taxes. No wonder thatpower of those not knowledgeable enough, devoid of
tax planning is regarded as the rich man's shot at taxpolitical clout, or not rich enough to protect themselves.
evasion. The irony is that taxes were intended toThe salaries of the lower strata of society are eroded
lessen social polarity and friction - but they achievedby inflation and this has the exact same effect as a
exactly the opposite.In economies where taxes gobbletax would. This is why inflation is called the poor man's
up to 60% of the GDP (France, Germany, to name atax.When the social consequences of levying
few) - taxes became THE major economicregressive taxes became fully evident, governments
disincentive. Why work for the taxman? Why financewent back to the drawing board. Regressive taxes
the lavish lifestyle of numerous politicians and bloatedwere politically and socially costly. Progressive taxes
bureaucracies through tax money? Why be a suckerresembled Swiss cheese: too many loopholes, not
when the rich and mighty play it safe?The resultsenough substances. The natural inclination was to try
were socially and morally devastating: an avalanche ofand plug the holes: disallow allowances, break tax
illegal activities, all intended to avoid paying taxes.breaks, abolish special preferences, eliminate loopholes,
Monstrous black economies were formed bywrite-offs, reliefs and a host of other, special
entrepreneuring souls. These economic activities wentdeductions. This entailed conflicts with special interest
unreported and totally deformed the processes ofgroups whose interests were duly reflected in the tax
macroeconomic decision making, supposedly based onloopholes.Governments, being political creatures, did a
complete economic data. This apparent lack ofhalf hearted job. They abolished on the one hand - and
macroeconomic control creates a second layer ofgave with the other. They wriggled their way around
mistrust between the citizen and his government (oncontroversial subjects and the result was that every
top of the one related to the collection ofloophole cutting measure brought in its wake a growing
taxes).Recent studies clearly indicate that a reversehost of others. The situation looked hopeless.Thus,
relationship exists between the growth of thegovernments were reduced to using the final,
economy and the extent of public spending. Moreover,nuclear-like, weapon in their arsenal: the simplification of
decades of progressive taxation did not reverse thethe tax system.The idea is aesthetically appealing: all
trend of a growing gap between the rich and the poor.tax concessions and loopholes will be eliminated, on the
Income distribution has remained inequitable (ever moreone hand. On the other, the number of tax rates and
so all the time) - despite gigantic unilateral transfers ofthe magnitude of each rate will be pared down.
money from the state to the poorer socio - economicMarginal tax rates will go down considerably and so
strata of society.Taxes are largely considered to bewill the number of tax rates. So, people will feel less
responsible for the following:They distorted businesslike cheating and they will spend less resources on the
thinking;Encouraged the misallocation of economicpreparation of their tax returns. The government, on its
resources;Diverted money to strange tax motivatedpart, will no longer use the tax system to express its
investments;Absorbed unacceptably large chunks of(political) preferences. It will propagate a simple,
the GDP;Deterred foreign investment;Morally corruptedtransparent, equitable, fair and non arbitrary system
the population, encouraging it to engage in massivewhich will generate more income by virtue of these
illegal activities;Adversely influenced macroeconomictraits.Governments from Germany to the USA are
parameters such as unemployment, the money supplyworking along the same lines. They are trying to stem
and interest rates;Deprived the business sector ofwhat is in effect a tax rebellion, a major case of civil
capital needed for its development by spending it ondisobedience. If they fail, the very fabric of societies will
non productive political ends;Caused the smuggling ofbe affected. If they succeed, we may all inherit a
capital outside the country;The formation of strongbetter world. Knowing the propensities of human
parallel, black economies and the falsification ofbeings, the safe bet is that people will still hate to see
economic records thus affecting the proper decisiontheir money wasted in unaccounted for ways on
making processes;Facilitated the establishment of big,bizarre, pork barrel, projects. As long as this is the
inefficient bureaucracies for the collection of taxes andcase, the eternal chase of the citizen by his
data related to income and economic activity;Forcedgovernment will continue.