History of Previous European Currency Unions

The Euro feels like a novelty - but it is not. It wasseemed to have been the Scandinavian Monetary
preceded by quite a few Monetary Unions in EuropeUnion.Sweden (1873), Denmark (1873) and Norway
and outside it.To start with, countries such as the USA(1875) formed the Scandinavian Monetary Union (SMU).
and the USSR are (or were in the latter's case)The pattern was familiar: they accepted each others'
monetary unions. A single currency was or is usedgold coins as legal tender in their territories. Token
over enormous land masses incorporating previouslycoins were also cross-boundary legal tender as were
distinct political, social and economic entities. Thebanknotes (1900) recognized by the banks of the
American constitution, for instance, did not provide formember countries. It worked so perfectly that no one
the existence of a central bank. Founding fathers, thewanted to convert the currencies and exchange rates
likes of Madison and Jefferson, objected to itswere not available from 1905 to 1924, when Sweden
existence. A central monetary institution wasdismantled the Union following Norway's independence.
established only in 1791 (modelled after the Bank ofActually, the countries involved created (though not
England). But Madison (as President) let its concessionofficially) what amounted to a unified central bank with
expire in 1811. It was revived in 1816 - only to die again. Itunified reserves - which extended monetary credit
took a civil war to lead to a budding monetary union.lines to each of the member countries.The
Bank regulation and supervision were instituted only inScandinavian Kronor held well as long as gold supply
1863 and a distinction was made between national andwas limited. World War I changed this situation as
state-level banks.By that time, 1562 private banksgovernments dumped gold and inflated their currencies,
were printing and issuing notes, some of them not aengaging in competitive devaluations. Central Banks
legal tender. In 1800 there were only 25. The sameused the depreciated currencies to buy gold at official
thing happened in the principalities which were later to(cheap) rates. Sweden saw through this ploy and
constitute Germany: 25 private banks wererefused to sell its gold in the officially fixed price. The
established only between 1847 and 1857 with theother members began to sell large quantities of the
express intention of printing banknotes to circulate astoken coins to Sweden and use the proceeds to buy
legal tender. In 1816 - 70 different types of currencythe much Stronger Swedish "economy" (=currency) at
(mostly foreign) were being used in the Rhinelandan ever cheaper price (as the price of gold collapsed).
alone.A tidal wave of banking crises in 1908 led to theSweden reacted by prohibiting the import of other
formation of the Federal Reserve System and 52members' tokens. Without a fixed price of gold and
years were to elapse until the full monopoly of moneywithout coin convertibility, there was no Union to talk
issuance was retained by it.What is a monetary union?of.The last big (and recent) experiment in monetary
Is it sufficient to have a single currency with free andunion was the East African Currency Area. An
guaranteed convertibility?Two additional conditionsequivalent experiment is still going on in the Francophile
apply: that the exchange rate be effective (realisticpart of Africa involving the CFA currency.The parts of
and, thus, not susceptible to speculative attacks) andEast Africa ruled by the British (Kenya, Uganda and
that the members of the union adhere to oneTanganyika and, in 1936, Zanzibar) adopted in 1922 a
monetary policy.Actually, history shows that thesingle common currency, the East African shilling.
condition of a single currency, though preferable, is notIndependence in East Africa had no monetary aspect
a sine qua non. A union could incorporate "severalbecause it remained part of the Sterling Area. This
currencies, fully and permanently convertible into oneguaranteed the convertibility of the local currencies into
another at irrevocably fixed exchange rates" which isBritish Pounds. Regarding this a matter of national pride
really like having a single currency with various(and strategic importance) the British poured inordinate
denominations, each printed by another member of theamounts of money into these emerging economies.
Union. What seems to be more important is theThis monetary union was not disturbed by the
relationship (as expressed through the exchange rate)introduction (1966) of local currencies in Kenya, Uganda
between the Union and other economic players. Theand Tanzania. The three currencies were legal tender
currency of the Union must be convertible to otherin each of these countries and were all convertible to
currencies at a given (could be fluctuating - but alwaysPounds.It was the Pound which gave way by strongly
one) exchange rate determined by a uniformdepreciating in the late 60s and early 70s. The Sterling
exchange rate policy. This must apply all over theArea was dismantled in 1972 and with it the strict
territory of the single currency - otherwise, arbitrageursmonetary discipline which it imposed - explicitly and
will buy it in one place and sell it in another andthrough the free convertibility - on its members. A
exchange controls would have to be imposed,divergence in the value of the currencies (due to
eliminating free convertibility and inducing panic.This isdifferent inflation targets and resulting interest rates)
not a theoretical - and thus unnecessary - debate. ALLwas inevitable. In 1977 the East African Currency Area
monetary unions in the past failed because theyended.Not all monetary unions met the same gloomy
allowed their currency or currencies to to beend, however. Arguably, the most famous of the
exchanged (against outside currencies) at varyingsuccessful ones is the Zollverein (German Customs
rates, depending on where it was converted (in whichUnion).At the beginning of the 19th century, there were
part of the monetary union)."Before long, all Europe,39 independent political units which made up the
save England, will have one money". This was writtenGerman Federation in what is today's Germany. They
by William Bagehot, the Editor of The Economist, theall minted coins (gold, silver) and had their own
renowned British magazine. Yet, it was written 120standards for weights and measures. Labour mobility in
years ago when Britain, even then, was debatingEurope was greatly enhanced by the decisions of the
whether to adopt a single European Currency.Joining aCongress of Vienna in 1815 but trade was still
monetary union means giving up independentineffective because of the number of different
monetary policy and, with it, a sizeable slice of nationalcurrencies.The German statelets formed a customs
sovereignty. The member country can no longerunion as early as 1818. This was followed by the
control its the money supply, its inflation or interestformation of three regional groupings (the Northern,
rates, or its foreign exchange rates. Monetary policy isCentral and Southern) which were united in 1833. In
transferred to a central monetary authority (European1828, Prussia harmonized and unified its tariffs with the
Central Bank). A common currency is a transmissionother members of the Federation. Debts related to
mechanism of economic signals (information) andcustoms could be paid in gold or silver. Several
expectations, often through the monetary policy. In acurrencies were developed and linked to each other
monetary union, fiscal profligacy of a few members,through fixed exchange rates. There was an
for example, often leads to the need to raise interestover-riding single currency: the Vereinsmunze. The
rates in order to pre-empt inflationary pressures. ThisZollverein (Customs Union) was established in 1834 to
need arises precisely because these countries share afacilitate trade and reduce its costs. Most of the
common currency. In other words, the effects of onepolitical units agreed to choose between one of two
member's fiscal decisions are communicated to othermonetary standards (the Thaler and the Gulden) in
members (through the monetary policy) because they1838 and nine years later, the central bank of Prussia
share one currency. The currency is the medium of(which comprised 70% of the population and land
exchange of information regarding the present andmass of the future Germany) became the effective
future health of the economies involved.MonetaryCentral Bank of the Federation. The North German
unions which did not follow this course are no longerThaler was fixed at 1.75 to the South German Gulden
with us.Monetary unions, as we said, are no novelty.and, in 1856 (when Austria became associated with
People felt the need to create a uniform medium ofthe Union), at 1.5 Austrian Florins (this was to be a
exchange as early as the times of Ancient Greeceshort lived affair, because Prussia and Austria declared
and Medieval Europe. However, those early monetarywar on each other in 1866).Germany was united by
unions did not bear the hallmarks of modern dayBismarck in 1871 and a Reichsbank was founded 4
unions: they did not have a central monetary authorityyears later. It issued the Reichsmark which became
or monetary policy, for instance.The first truly modernthe legal and only tender of the whole German Reich.
example would be the monetary union of Colonial NewThe currency Union survived two world wars, a
England.The New England colonies (Connecticut,devastating bout of inflation in 1923 and a collapse of
Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire and Rhodethe currency after the Second World War. The
Island) accepted each other's paper money as legalReichsmark became the solid and reliable Bundesbank.
tender until 1750. These notes were even accepted asThe Union still survives in the Deutschmark.This is the
tax payments by the governments of the colonies.only case of a monetary union which succeeded
Massachusetts was a dominant economy andwithout being preceded by a political arrangement. It
sustained this arrangement for almost a century. Itsurvived because Prussia was sizeable and had
was envy that ended this very successfulenough real power and perceived clout to enforce
arrangement: the other colonies began to print theircompliance on the other members of the Federation.
own notes outside the realm of the union.Prussia wanted to have a stable currency and
Massachusetts bought back (redeemed) all its paperintroduced consistent metallic standards. The other
money in 1751, paying for it in silver. It instituted astates could not deprive their currencies of their
mono-metalic (silver) standard and ceased to acceptintrinsic values. For the first time in history, coinage
the paper money of the other three colonies.Thebecame a professional economic decision, totally
second, more important, experiment was the Latindepoliticized.In this context, we must mention another
Monetary Union. It was a purely French contraption,successful (on-going) union - the CFA Franc Zone.The
intended to further, cement, and augment its politicalCFA (French African Community) is a currency used
prowess and monetary clout. Belgium adopted thein the former French colonies of West and Central
French Franc when it attained independence in 1830. ItAfrica (and, curiously, in one formerly Spanish colony).
was only natural that France and Belgium (togetherThe currency zone has been in existence for well
with Switzerland) should encourage others to join themover three decades and comprises diverse ethnic,
in 1848. Italy followed in 1861 and the last ones werelingual, cultural, political and economic units. The
Greece and Bulgaria (!) in 1867. Together they formedcurrency withstood devaluations (the latest one of
the bimetallic currency union known as the Latin100% vis a vis the French Franc), changes of regimes
Monetary Union (LMU).The LMU seriously flirted with(from colonial to independent), the existence of two
Austria and Spain. The Foundation Treaty wasgroups of members, each with its own central bank,
officially signed only on 23/12/1865 in Paris.The rules ofcontrols of trade and capital flows - not to mention a
this Union were somewhat peculiar and, in somehost of natural and man made catastrophes. What
respects, seemed to defy conventional economicmakes it so successful is maybe the fact that the
wisdom.Unofficially, the French influence extended toreserves of the member states are hoarded in the
18 countries which adopted the Gold Franc as theirsafes of the French Central Bank and that the
monetary basis. Four of them agreed on a gold tocurrency is almost absolutely convertible to the French
silver conversion rate and minted gold coins whichFranc. Convertibility is guaranteed by the French
were legal tender in all of them. They voluntarilyTreasury itself.France imposes monetary discipline
accepted a money supply limitation which forbade(that it sometimes lacks at home!) directly and through
them to print more than 6 Franc coins per capita (theits generous financial assistance.Europe has had more
four were: France, Belgium, Italy andthan its share of botched (the Snake, the EMS, the
Switzerland).Officially (and really) a gold standardERM) and of successful (ECU, the United Kingdom and
developed throughout Europe and included coin issuersIreland) currency unifications.A neglected one is
such as Germany and the United Kingdom). Still, in thebetween Belgium and Luxembourg (BENELUX is the
Latin Monetary Union, the quantities of gold and silverpolitical alignment which includes the Netherlands).There
Union coins that member countries could mint wasis no real currency union here. Both maintain separate
unlimited. Regardless of the quantities minted, the coinscurrencies. But their currencies are at parity and serve
were legal tender across the Union. Smalleras legal tender in both countries since 1921. The Belgian
denomination (token) silver coins, minted in limitedCentral Bank controls the monetary policies of both
quantity, were legal tender only in the issuingcountries, with the exception of exchange regulations
country.There was no single currency like the Euro.which are overseen by a joint agency. In both 1982
Countries maintained their national currencies (coins),and 1993 the two countries considered dismantling the
but these were at parity with each other. Anunion - but this was not serious talk, the advantages
exchange commission of 1.25 % was charged tobeing so numerous (especially to the smaller
convert them. The tokens had a lower silver contentpartner).These three currency unions have all survived
than the Union coins.Governmental and municipaldue mainly to the fact that one monetary authority has
offices were required to accept up to 100 Francs ofbeen responsible, at least de facto, for managing the
tokens (even though they were not convertible andcurrency.What can we learn from all this (not
had a lower intrinsic value) in a single transaction. Thisinsubstantial) cumulative experience?(A) A dominant
loophole led to mass arbitrage: converting low metalcountry is required for a Union to succeed. It must
content coins to buy high metal content ones.Thehave a strong geopolitical drive and maintain political
Union had no money supply policy or management. Itsolidarity with some of the other members. It must be
was left to the market to determine how much moneybig, influential, and its economy must be intermeshed
will be in circulation. The central banks pledged the freewith the economies of the others.(B) Central institutions
conversion of gold and silver to coins. But, this pledgemust be set up to monitor and enforce fiscal and other
meant that the Central Banks of the participatingpolicies, to coordinate activities of the member states,
countries were forced to maintain a fixed ratio ofto implement political and technical decisions, to control
exchange between the two metals (15 to 1, at thethe money aggregates and seniorage (=money
time) ignoring the prices fixed daily in the worldprinting), to determine the legal tender and the rules
markets.The LMU was too negligible to influence thegoverning the issuance of money.(C) It is better if a
world prices of these two metals. The result wasmonetary union is preceded by a political one. Even so,
overvalued silver, export of silver from one member toit might prove tricky (consider the examples of the
another using ingenious and ever more devious waysUSA and of Germany).(D) Wage and price flexibility
of circumventing the rules of the Union. There was noare sine qua non. Their absence is a threat to the
choice but to suspend silver convertibility and thuscontinued existence of any union. Fiscal policy (money
acknowledge a de facto gold standard. Silver coinstransfers from rich areas to poor) are a partial
and tokens remained legal tender.This became aremedy. They can mitigate and ameliorate problems -
major problem for the Union and the coup de gracebut not solve them. Transfers also call for a clear and
was delivered by the unprecedented financing needsconsistent fiscal policy regarding taxation and
brought on by the First World War. The LMU wasexpenditures. Problems like unemployment plague a
officially dismantled in 1926 - but died long before that.rigid, sedimented union. The works of Mundell and
The lesson: a common currency is not enough - aMcKinnon (optimal currency areas) prove it decisively
common monetary policy monitored and enforced by(and separately).(E) The last prerequisite is clear
a common Central Bank is required in order to sustainconvergence criteria and monetary convergence
a monetary union.As the LMU was being formed, intargets.Judging by these requirements, the current
1867, an International Monetary Conference wasEuropean monetary union did not sufficiently assimilate
convened. Twenty countries participated andthe lessons of its ill begotten predecessors. It is set in a
discussed the introduction of a global currency. TheyEurope more rigid in its labour and pricing practices
decided to adopt the gold (British, USA) standard andthan 150 years ago, it was not preceded by serious
to allow for a transition period. They agreed to usepolitical amalgamation, it relies too heavily on transfers
three major "hard" currencies but to equate their goldwithout having in place either a coherent monetary or
content so as to render them completelya consistent fiscal policy.This monetary union is,
interchangeable. Nothing came out of it - but this plantherefore, likely to join its forefathers and remain a
was a lot more sensible than the LMU.One wrong pathfootnote in the annals of economic history.