Learn everything about the taxes you pay


Value added tax (VAT)

Value added tax (VAT) is a type of salesmaterials) by certifying it is not a
tax. In some countries, includingconsumer.
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, andLimitations to VAT
Singapore, this tax is known as "goodsIn the above example, we assumed that
and services tax" or GST; and in Japanthe same number of widgets were made and
it is known as "consumption tax". VAT issold both before and after the
an indirect tax, in that the tax isintroduction of the tax. This is not
collected from someone other than thetrue in real life.
person who actually bears the cost ofThe fundamentals of supply and demand
the tax (namely the seller rather thansuggest that any tax raises the cost of
the consumer). As VAT is intended as atransaction for someone, whether it is
tax on consumption, exports (which are,the seller or purchaser. In raising the
by definition, consumed abroad) arecost, either the demand curve shifts
usually not subject to VAT or VAT isleftward, or the supply curve shifts
refunded.leftwards. The two are functionally
VAT was invented by a French economistequivalent. Consequently, the quantity
in 1954. Maurice Lauré, jointof a good purchased, and/or the price
director of the French tax authority,for which it is sold, decrease.
the Direction générale desThis shift in supply and demand is not
impôts, as taxe sur la valeurincorporated into the above example, for
ajoutée (TVA in French) was firstsimplicity and because these effects are
to introduce VAT with effect from 10different for every type of good. The
April 1954 for large businesses, andabove example assumes the tax is
extended over time to all businessnon-distortionary.
sectors. In France, it is the mostA VAT, like as any other tax, distorts
important source of state finance,what would have happened without it.
accounting for approximately 45% ofBecause the price for someone rises, the
state revenues.quantity of goods traded decreases.
Personal end-consumers of products,Correspondingly, some people are worse
consumers and services cannot recoveroff by more than the government is made
VAT on purchases, but businesses arebetter off by tax income . That is, more
able to recover VAT on the materials andis lost due to supply and demand shifts
services that they buy to make furtherthan is gained in tax. This is known as
supplies or services directly ora deadweight loss. The income lost by
indirectly sold to end-users. In thisthe economy is greater than the
way, the total tax levied at each stagegovernment's income; the tax is
in the economic chain of supply is ainefficient. The entire amount of the
constant fraction of the value added bygovernment's income (the tax revenue)
a business to its products, and most ofmay not be a deadweight drag, if the tax
the cost of collecting the tax is bornerevenue is used for productive spending
by business, rather than by the state.or has positive externalities - in other
VAT was invented because very high saleswords, governments may do more than
taxes and tariffs encourage cheating andsimply consume the tax income. While
smuggling. It has been criticized on thedistortions occur, consumption taxes
grounds that it is a regressive tax.like VAT are often considered superior
Examplebecause they distort incentives to
Consider the manufacture and sale of anyinvest, save and work less than other
item, which in this case we will call atypes of taxation - in other words, a
widget.VAT discourages consumption rather than
Without any sales taxproduction.
A widget manufacturer spends $1 on rawVAT criticisms
materials and uses them to make aThe "Value added tax" has been
widget.criticized as the burden of it relies on
The widget is sold wholesale to a widgetpersonal end-consumers of products and
retailer for $1.20, making a profit ofis therefore, as any sales tax based on
$0.20.the consumption of essentials, a
The widget retailer then sells theregressive tax (the poor pay more, in
widget to a widget consumer for $1.50,comparison, than the rich). French
making a profit of $0.30President Jacques Chirac has often
With a U.S.-style sales taxpleaded for a reduction of European VAT
With a 10% sales tax:concerning catering, in order to win
The manufacturer pays $1.00 for the rawfavour from this sector.
materials, certifying it is not a finalRevenues from a value added tax are
consumer.frequently lower than expected because
The manufacturer charges the retailerthey are difficult and costly to
$1.20, checking that the retailer is notadminister and collect. In many
a consumer, leaving the same profit ofcountries, however, where collection of
$0.20.personal income taxes and corporate
The retailer charges the consumer $1.65profit taxes has been historically weak,
($1.50 + 10%) and pays the governmentVAT collection has been more successful
$0.15, leaving the same profit of $0.30.than other types of taxes. VAT has
become more important in many
So the consumer has paid 10% ($0.15)jurisdictions as tariff levels have
extra, compared to the no taxationfallen worldwide due to trade
scheme, and the government has collectedliberalisation, as VAT has essentially
this amount in taxation. The retailersreplaced lost tariff revenues. Whether
have not lost anything directly to thethe costs and distortions of value added
tax, but they do have the extrataxes are lower than the economic
paperwork to do so that they correctlyinefficiencies and enforcement issues
pass on to the government the sales tax(e.g. smuggling) from high import
they collect. Suppliers andtariffs is debated, but theory suggests
manufacturers are not affected by thevalue added taxes are far more
tax, though they have to check theirefficient.
customers' status.Due to the fact that exports are
With a VATgenerally zero-rated (and VAT refunded
With a 10% VAT:or offset against other taxes), this is
The manufacturer pays $1.10 ($1 + 10%)often where VAT fraud occurs. In sectors
for the raw materials, and the seller ofor countries where VAT fraud is
the raw materials pays the governmentprevalent, attempts by authorities to
$0.10.control fraud may have unintended
The manufacturer charges the retailerconsequences, and raise costs for honest
$1.32 ($1.20 + 10%) and pays thecompanies. This problem is also true of
government $0.02 ($0.12 minus $0.10),other types of taxation, however.
leaving the same profit of $0.20.Certain industries (small-scale
The retailer charges the consumer $1.65services, for example) tend to have more
($1.50 + 10%) and pays the governmentVAT avoidance, particularly where cash
$0.03 ($0.15 minus $0.12), leaving thetransactions predominate, and VAT may be
same profit of $0.30.criticised for encouraging this. From
So the consumer has paid 10% ($0.15)the perspective of government, however,
extra, compared to the no taxationVAT may be preferable because it
scheme, and the government has collectedcaptures at least some of the
this amount in taxation. The businessesvalue-added. For example, a carpenter
have not lost anything directly to themay offer to provide services for cash
tax, but they do have the extra(i.e. without a receipt, and without
paperwork to do so that they correctlyVAT) to a homeowner, who usually cannot
pass on to the government the differenceclaim input VAT back. The homeowner will
between what they collect in VAT (outputhence bear lower costs and the carpenter
VAT, an 11th of their income) and whatmay be able to avoid other taxes (profit
they spend in VAT (input VAT, an 11th ofor payroll taxes). The government,
their expenditure).however, may still receive VAT for
Note that in each case the VAT paid isvarious other inputs - lumber, paint,
equal to 10% of the profit, or 'valuegasoline, tools, etc. While the total
added'.tax receipts may be lower compared to
The advantage of the VAT system over thefull compliance, it may not be lower
sales tax system is that businessesthan under other feasible taxation
cannot hide consumption (such as wastedsystems.



1 A B C D E 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127