The Origins of Anarchy

"When, in some obscure country town, the farmersall that they can, committing all types of crimes, so that
come together to a special town meeting, to expressthey can prevent this change of organization, these
their opinion on some subject which is vexing the land,revolutionary changes.The arguments presented by all
that, I think, is the true Congress, and the mostConservative theorists and parties are always the
respectable one that is ever assembled in the Unitedsame. Whenever presented with a new reform, an
States."-- Henry David Thoreau,alteration of modern society, a change in organization
"Slavery in Massachusetts," 1906 Houghton Mifflinof social order, we always hear the same arguments.
edition printingWhat is it that turns a man or a womanWe will always hear their primary argument: humanity
in to an Anarchist? When I ask this question, there arewas not built for this new system. There is no way
many others that I might as well ask. What is it thatthat the nature of humans could ever allow for a
makes a person a Communist, a Socialist, a Liberal, autopian dream. Man is naturally cruel, greedy, and
Leftist, a Syndicalist, a Freethinker, a Non-Conformist --mean-hearted, and it is his baser instincts that should
all words in to one, what is it that makes a man abe given free reign in the social order; otherwise, the
Progressive? I know the definitions of these terms. Ifunctionality that we appreciate of today's economy
am quite familiar with that part of the question, "whatwould completely fail. "It won't work!" Of course,
makes a person a progressive?" A person is made athough, this was the same argument the
Communist by his ideal of turning all farms, factories,Conservatives presented to Abolitionists and Women
and mines in to public property. Another individual isSuffragists. They claimed that, if the slaves were
made an anti-authoritarian by his ideal for a socialfreed, or if women were allowed to vote, that the nuts
organization where authority must respect all the rightsand bolts of social organization would snap, and we
of the private citizen. Those who call themselveswould end up as hunter gatherers again. They also tell
Liberals are supportive of reform measures in theus that these new reforms will compromise our
system, such as welfare to alleviate poverty. All ofintegrity. "By giving women the right to vote, it saps the
these individuals, all of these little sects, collectives, andmorality out of men," is the argument. They will make
groups work to change the world. Respect for thereferences to god and religion, or just about any
freedom of association, speech, and thought;obscure, unknown, unseen principle. Since religion has
demilitarization of all western nations; regulations tokept men in shackles for hundreds of years, these
protect the working class; a fair tax that takes moreindustrialists feel content that it can still keep them in
from the wealthy than from the poor. It is understoodslavery for the coming years. Whatever the case, the
by nearly everyone that these are the common endsarguments of these Conservatives always fail. Our
that these progressive groups organize to achieve.Thesocial organization is a much more effective system
essential premise of every group I mentioned was thethan theirs, in theory and in practice. There is no
improvement of mankind by certain changes, reforms,argument that can bypass that simple fact.It is we, the
and other alterations of habit and policy. "By followingAnarchists, the Progressives, the Communists, the
the suggestions we present here, in heart and in mind,Socialists, and the others who want to compromise
following them as a practice and believing in them as athe position of a few top individuals in order to give
theory, we will create a better condition of civilization,"peace and liberty to the general population. Because of
they all say, "We will support this change. Some willthis, we have a second reason to come together and
offer our support in finances, others in action, others inwork in cooperation. We call this reason a sense of
their vote, and others still, just in their voice. In effect,justice, of right conquering wrong, of good triumphing
we will be creating a new order of social organizationover evil; we are motivated to work side by side so
and cultural understanding that will alleviate misery andthat we can achieve the greater good. In marches, we
create happiness." All of our arguments generallystand face-to-face with riot police. In unions, we
seem to be based on philanthropy; we have the samealways must accept the fact of a lockout or losing our
motives as those men and women who want to endjobs. We are rebellious and non-conformist students in
suffering and make a utopia out of the existing socialthe schools and organizers of the people. The fact
order. That is to say, not that class of individual whothat we must band together, that we must have a
calls themselves revolutionary, or even reformer, butliving and breathing solidarity with our brothers and
one who goes by the title philanthropist, humanitarian, orsisters, that we are fighting together against the
saint to the poor and unwanted. These people whoenemies of goodness and truth, that there are people
are trying to improve the lot of mankind when theywho are working to oppress us, all of these facts bring
build hospitals, arrange for funds to cure cancer orus together and make us fight harder. Philanthropists
educate the people, organize community activities, ornever bring people together to "achieve social justice"
they work to feed those whose our social order hasor "eliminate the system that has caused so many
hurt the most. This is always the case when it comestoxic excesses." Only revolutionaries come together in
to the poor, minorities, or other groups that have beenorder to obstruct the path of the god Moloch, to
disadvantaged by the present situation of society.organize so that our combined strength is enough to
Today when we look back, at authors like Saint-Simonoutdo the enormous, centralized, regimented forces of
who argued for a fund be set up for innovation andthe defenders of slavery. That is where this sense of
technology, or promiment figures like Jane Addamsjustice always come from. We unite not just as
who managed a charity house. While we praise thesebringers of a new way of life, the prophets of an ideal
people as the great forefathers of the philanthropycivilization realized through cooperative effort. We unite
movements, in their time, they were consideredas active and powerful changers of the current
revolutionaries, breakers of society's tides. In their ownstanding order. We work together not to ask for
time, these defenders of science funds and poorscraps from our masters, but to demand and take our
houses were considered unorthodox, maybe evenliberty back from them!The first act of becoming a
un-Christian and anti-social.The goals of theserevolutionary is in understanding that the current state
humanitarians and revolutionaries are the same: toof society is not the only way social organization can
create a society where there is less evil and greatertake place. There is a better way for the world exist
good. What is the difference, then, between theand there are better policies for men to adopt. Should
philanthropists and social agitators? The motives ofthese progressive policies gain widespread approval,
both may essentially both be the same: we want tothe primary miseries of civilization will be abolished and
create a world that is much more desirable. Thethe excesses and corruption of the spirit will be
philanthropists do this through charity work, while theeliminated. The philosophers will look at this new culture
revolutionaries do this through trying to change theand this new people, and maybe they will call them
system. The first respect the social order and desireideal, but I know the poets will look upon our new world
not to change it, while the second feels that all of theand say it is free. The second step in becoming a
ills of our present system are caused by therevolutionary is accepting and believing the fact that
regulations and laws of the people. The call of thethis free world is and always has been possible, but
charity worker is, "Work together, in order to helpthere are privileged individuals of the current system
those who have been lost." But the call of thewho have mobilized their power against the interests
revolutionary soldier is, "Work together, in order thatof the people. In order to set up a food bank or
we might overthrow today's oppressive regime." Wehousing for the homeless, philanthropists are not
differ from the humanitarians in many marked ways.hindered by police officers. But in order to destroy the
Most notable of all differences, there is the question ofsystem that causes starvation and homelessness, we
how society respects these two groups. Rarely hasare are attacked, harassed, and beaten by the
the established order ever taken an opposition tostormtroopers of the present order. They bitterly
charity groups. They don't seek to change things, butoppose us, because if we succeed, then they lose
only to alleviate temporary miseries; and they do thistheir power, and the world loses all forms of slavery
as though the suffering they end is not a part of theand authority. The third and final step of becoming a
system's excess, but in accordance with the idea thatrevolutionary, of becoming the gunpowder to spark an
the humans of this society are flawed. They believe inexplosion in social relationships, is action. We must act.
the theory that humanity, not the social relationship,We must proliferate these ideas, organize unions,
needs to be reformed. Either it's the poor not tryingprotest, march in the streets, publish, distribute,
hard enough, or it's the wealthy not being liberal enough.exchange, cooperate, manage, organize, organize,
The theories of charity workers never ceases toorganize. That is the call to the Anarchist of our
impress the imaginations of revolutionaries.We want toworld.The only reason that liberty means anything to
alter the system, change its rules, revolutionize theus is because authority means something to us. If we
social organization. The traditions or heritages that thewere ignorant of their tactics of imprisonment, torture,
members of human history have carried with themexecutions, censorship, and deception; if we were
must be abandoned. There is a better word for suchtotally blind to their methods of oppression, coercion,
"traditions": prejudices. And they must be left behind,and violence, then we would not cling to liberty as an
ignored, and not our source of guidance, if we areall-serving agent of good. It was not until disease came
going to live cooperatively and mutually in order toabout that physicians stressed prevention methods of
achieve peace and happiness. In desiring to changespreading germs. It was not until cancer came about
social roles, we revolutionaries act as an enormousthat medical professionals became so engrossed in
threat to those who have power. The defenders ofchasing the cure. And it so happens with our cause:
Civil Rights acted as a threat to those the whitethe illness Capitalism and government shows with the
community that had accepted the prejudices of anextraordinary amounts of poverty, unemployment, and
ancient society. Martin Luther King's efforts focused onmisery. It seems to be a perpetual hell on this earth,
allowing African Americans in any role in society,solely because the heritage and traditions of our
whether as members of the ruling class, employees offorefathers included Capitalism, an idea that would
any business, or students of all schools. Theserve as the right hand to exploitation. The one
advocates of Free Enterprise were an enormouscommon string that can be found in all of these
threat to the feudal lords. They wanted all serfs to beprogressive movements, whether Anarchist,
freed from what has always seemed to be aSyndicalist, Libertarian, Liberal, Communist, Socialist, or
perpetual slavory of the poor and downtrodden. TheMarxist, is to overthrow authority where it is harmful
Feminist movement, the anti-Child labor movement, thetowards mankind. Progressivists of human sexuality
Socialist movement, the Environmentalist movement --argue that the state should have no authority over
all of these organizations of citizens were broughtsexual activity; group of individuals can do whatever
together so that the social order would be rearrangedthey want, so long as there is consent. Unionists
for the interests of all. We are a threat to thealways organize so that employers do not have as
established "way of things," this rightfully demonizedmuch authority over them. And those proud members
thing called culture. All of the members who benefitof the civil disobedience squad are in opposition to the
from the culture, all of those who hold high positions, orgovernment's use of authority in foreign countries,
moderately high positions, all of them have an interestthrough aggressive militarism and imperialism. We may
in preventing the revolution from achieving its aims.use all of these titles and names that we've applied to
Whether it creates happiness or not, whether itourselves in so many cases. But the goals of these
prevents suffering or not, it doesn't matter. Theirleftist activists is all the same: to eliminate the painful
argument is and always will be: "We may or may notcondition of being a slave in obedience to an unjust
believe in our way of doing things. That's not the pointauthority.As men and women who seek change in
at hand. The point at hand is that I can live like a kingsociety, our primary objective is this: to organize the
so long as you live like a slave. If you stop being asocial forces in a way that justice, peace, and equality
slave, I won't be able to exist in the lavish conditionsgenuinely exist. For this reason, we are in the same
that give me luxury and comfort."Philanthropists andranks as social reformers, organizers of charities,
charity workers organize in order to save the system.pro-bono legal counsel for the poor, distributors of
Their calling to hand is the betterment of mankind. Thatfoodboxes to low-income families, and those who
is the initial instinct that draws together Socialists,cook food to give to the homeless. What makes us,
Communists, Leftists, Progressives, and Anarchists inthe revolutionaries of the world, different from these
their efforts: the betterment of mankind. However, wephilanthropists is that we believe the misery of society
differ widely at this point in the road with our brotherswas created by its organization. In our opinion, poverty
of good heart. We want to destroy the system, inis not simply the biproduct of the Capitalist, so much as
order so a more effective social organization can takeit is the direct result of Free Enterprise. War,
place, where the miseries of mankind are absent andImperialism, and Colonialism, the exploitation of these
where his freedom is prized above all else. In theirforeign countries, is not an indirect result of
efforts, they are met with kindness and felicity. But ingovernment, but the chief aim of all organized,
our efforts, as revolutionaries and agitators of thehierarchial groups. Racism, bigotry, prejudice, and
government, the coals under the foot of the giant, wecultural clashes are not so much caused by
are opposed, detested, and persecuted. Thedifferences of heritage, so much as they are caused
Haymarket Riot was caused by police officersby lack of a truly free education. We analyze society,
shooting and killing unarmed protestors who wanted anand see the very causes of all the suffering that
eight hour work day. Thousands of Pacifists werehumans are enduring. And, as revolutionaries, it is our
arrested by the government for refusing to take upgoal not to repair the damage done by the system, but
arms against their fellow brethren of European nationsto change the system. That is the manifesto of a
in the first world war. Those who burned their draftrevolutionary. Life,
cards during the Vietnam conflict were likewisePunkerslutPunkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been
arrested. The authors of unpopular essays, pamphlets,writing essays and poetry on social issues which have
and journals have always been oppressed by societycaught his attention for several years. His website
or looked upon with suspicion by authorities. Whetherprovides a complete list of all of these writings. His life
they released publications that question sexual moralsexperience includes homelessness, squating in New
or supported equal rights, their books have beenOrleans and LA, dropping out of high school, getting
censored and their publishers have been fined. There isexpelled from college for "subversive activities," and a
this enormous structure of the privileged classes, doingmyriad of other revolutionary actions.